- DTN Headline News
Taxlink by Andy Biebl
Friday, October 28, 2016 2:46PM CDT

By Andy Biebl
DTN Tax Columnist

I have written in the past about how the tax code contains special opportunities for farm tax returns that run in the red. With the ag economy continuing to suffer and with year-end tax planning coming up, it's time to take a deeper dive into utilizing these provisions.


Generally, if a 1040 has a business loss that drives the return into negative territory, the net operating loss can be carried back two years (i.e., a 2016 tax loss carries first to 2014, then forward to 2015, and if large enough, onward to 2017, etc.). But if the loss arises from a farming business, a special five-year carryback applies.

For example, assume the 2016 1040 has $40,000 of salary income and a $240,000 Schedule F loss, for a net negative of $200,000. The loss carries back initially to the 2011 tax year, which for most producers was a high-bracket era. The loss works from the top down, offsetting the highest bracket income first. For example, if the $200,000 loss reduces the 2011 income from $300,000 to $100,000, it's reducing income ranging from the 33% to 25% brackets and generating perhaps a $60,000 refund. If the loss totally eliminates the 2011 taxable income, the excess then moves forward to 2012 and subsequent years.

You may electively decline the special five-year carryback, and instead use the general two-year carryback if it produces a greater tax benefit. Thus, that $200,000 loss in 2016 could be carried to 2014 if that was a higher bracket year. Taking a loss to 2014 could also make sense if combined with revocation of a large 2014 Sec. 179 deduction, effectively trading the 2016 loss for future depreciation.


Taking a 2016 farm loss back to reduce 2011 income is only the first step. The second is to amend 2013 and 2014 tax returns for an improved income averaging calculation. Income averaging looks to the prior three-year tax base to establish the rate for the year in question. The 2012 tax return is closed and can't be amended at this point, but 2013 and 2014 are open for amendment if the 2011 base year income is lower. The tax results can be eye-popping. In our example, that $200,000 tax loss not only harvests refunds from 2011, but knocks down the tax rate applicable to 2013 and 2014. Who knew a bad year after good ones could be so much fun!


The flexibility of the cash method allows you to move the needle dramatically on the amount of a 2016 farm tax loss. The challenge lies in analyzing the tax rate history and prior averaging computations now, to determine the optimum 2016 loss that maximizes tax recoveries from prior years. Your tax preparer has the software to do the "what ifs," and running that software is essential given the complexity of our tax system. You will need to work closely with your tax adviser to determine what makes sense at year-end both business-wise and tax-wise.


Editor's note: Andy Biebl is a CPA and tax principal with the firm of CliftonLarsonAllen LLP in Minneapolis with more than 40 years' experience in ag taxation, including decades as a trainer for the American Institute of CPAs and other technical seminars. He will be presenting on this subject and other good tax habits at the DTN-Progressive Farmer Ag Summit Dec. 5-7 in Chicago www.dtnagsummit.com.

To pose questions for future tax columns, e-mail AskAndy@dtn.com.


blog iconDTN Blogs & Forums
DTN Market Matters Blog
Editorial Staff
Wednesday, October 26, 2016 7:46AM CDT
Monday, October 24, 2016 12:18PM CDT
Wednesday, October 19, 2016 9:02AM CDT
Technically Speaking
Darin Newsom
DTN Senior Analyst
Monday, October 24, 2016 8:24AM CDT
Sunday, October 23, 2016 1:37PM CDT
Sunday, October 23, 2016 1:35PM CDT
Fundamentally Speaking
Joel Karlin
DTN Contributing Analyst
Tuesday, October 25, 2016 2:21PM CDT
Friday, October 21, 2016 7:44AM CDT
Thursday, October 20, 2016 10:49AM CDT
DTN Ag Policy Blog
Chris Clayton
DTN Ag Policy Editor
Tuesday, October 25, 2016 2:45PM CDT
Thursday, October 20, 2016 12:26PM CDT
Wednesday, October 19, 2016 2:41PM CDT
Minding Ag's Business
Marcia Taylor
DTN Executive Editor
Thursday, October 27, 2016 2:06PM CDT
Thursday, October 20, 2016 10:41AM CDT
Monday, October 10, 2016 7:58PM CDT
DTN Ag Weather Forum
Bryce Anderson
DTN Ag Meteorologist and DTN Analyst
Friday, October 28, 2016 2:06PM CDT
Thursday, October 27, 2016 2:54PM CDT
Wednesday, October 26, 2016 9:20AM CDT
Friday, October 28, 2016 2:08PM CDT
Friday, October 28, 2016 12:32PM CDT
Thursday, October 27, 2016 2:01PM CDT
DTN Production Blog
Pam Smith
Crops Technology Editor
Friday, October 14, 2016 3:27PM CDT
Tuesday, October 11, 2016 1:43PM CDT
Friday, October 7, 2016 2:57PM CDT
Harrington's Sort & Cull
John Harrington
DTN Livestock Analyst
Friday, October 14, 2016 3:44PM CDT
Friday, October 7, 2016 6:52PM CDT
Friday, September 23, 2016 4:27PM CDT
South America Calling
Alastair Stewart
South America Correspondent
Friday, October 28, 2016 1:57PM CDT
Friday, September 30, 2016 4:49PM CDT
Monday, September 26, 2016 12:43PM CDT
An Urban’s Rural View
Urban Lehner
Editor Emeritus
Monday, October 24, 2016 10:19AM CDT
Monday, October 17, 2016 6:11AM CDT
Tuesday, October 11, 2016 6:22AM CDT
Machinery Chatter
Jim Patrico
Progressive Farmer Senior Editor
Wednesday, October 26, 2016 6:48AM CDT
Thursday, October 20, 2016 4:16PM CDT
Wednesday, October 12, 2016 12:51PM CDT
Canadian Markets
Cliff Jamieson
Canadian Grains Analyst
Friday, October 28, 2016 3:25PM CDT
Thursday, October 27, 2016 4:41PM CDT
Wednesday, October 26, 2016 3:45PM CDT
Editor’s Notebook
Greg D. Horstmeier
DTN Editor-in-Chief
Monday, October 3, 2016 4:25PM CDT
Tuesday, September 27, 2016 10:57AM CDT
Friday, August 5, 2016 8:54AM CDT
Copyright DTN. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.
Powered By DTN